Cases 41 - 50 of 133
DEAN et al v. FRANK et al
as 2:2015cv02722
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DEAN , TYREE MILES and TYRONE DEAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH FRANK and ELIZABETH ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Kenneth Fender
as 15-11475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH DEAN FENDER
Cook v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00840
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamsmith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Hamsmith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Zollicoffer v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv03037
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Zollicoffer
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Ralph Bales, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dean
as 1:2014cv00434
Petitioner:
Harold Lee Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Kenneth Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Dean
as 1:2014cv00433
Petitioner:
Harold Lee Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Kenneth Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Dean
as 1:2014cv00435
Petitioner:
Harold Lee Thomas, Jr
Respondent:
Kenneth Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Back v. Kenneth Dean, et al
as 14-50873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BACK
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN KENNETH DEAN and ALL HUGHES UNIT ADMINISTRATION STAFF
Trustees of the So Cal Pipe Tr, et al v. C. H. Stone Plumbing Co., Inc., et al
as 14-56269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIPE TRADES HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIPE TRADES PENSIONERS AND SURVING SPOUSES HEALTH FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIPE TRADES RETIREMENT TRUST FUND and others
Defendant:
C. H. STONE PLUMBING CO., INC., DBA C. H. Stone
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID KENNETH DEAN, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
