Cases 1 - 10 of 133
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dean Wilborn
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris et al v. Sugarman et al
as 1:2023cv09327
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Morris, Alger Jason Ryan Morris, James Baker and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Dean Sugarman, Bank of America, N.A. and John and Jane Does 1-25
3Rd Party Defendant:
Atlanta Legal Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Becker v. USA
as 8:2023cv00263
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dean Becker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 4:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wade Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean, Wanda Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pursell v. Tatum et al
as 3:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pursell
Defendant:
Lewis Tatum, Kenneth Dean and Wanda Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Broomfield
as 5:2022cv01316
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Respondent:
Unknown and Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dawson v. Unknown
as 2:2022cv00267
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deans v. Daggatt
as 4:2022cv05011
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Deans
Defendant:
Scott Daggatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United States v. Kenneth Becker
as 22-1042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kenneth Dean Becker
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
