Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jackson v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03167
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
The People of the State of Illinois and Cook County States Attorney's Office Criminal Prosecutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01519
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Dart and Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWEN et al v. GIBSON COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 3:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
KENDRA OWEN, SHIELA JACKSON and KENNETH JACKSON
Defendant:
GIBSON COUNTY, INDIANA and GIBSON COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Department of Corrections, Officer Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Kreuser et al
as 2:2018cv01641
Defendant:
Mary T Kubicki, Joseph M Cardamone, III, Geoffrey Dowse and others
Plaintiff:
James Kenneth Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01989
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Sgt. Rudnick and Sgt. Hein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Alderman et al
as 1:2016cv04609
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Officer Alderman, Officer Thomas and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv50201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
