Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Levin v. Martin et al
as 1:2019cv03679
Defendant:
Kenneth Martin and 1 Hundred Trucking Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Howard Levin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Kenneth Douglas
as 19-30258
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH MARTIN DOUGLAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kenneth Martin et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 6:2019cv02146
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Martin and Patricia Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. USA
as 1:2019cv00454
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Martin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brandy Harris v. Britney May
as 19-1418
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERVISOR OFFICER HUMPHRIES, MUNICIPAL COURT ROCK HILL S.C., 120 E. Black St. 29730, SCOTT CRIBB and others
Defendant:
ROCK HILL MUNICIPAL COURT, 120 East Black, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDY V. HARRIS
Kenneth Gardner v. Nancy Berryhill
as 19-55044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH MARTIN GARDNER, an individual resident of San Diego, CA, and a disabled veteran
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security
Harris v. Rock Hill Municipal Court et al
as 0:2018cv03499
Defendant:
Paula Brown, Antoine Logan, Christopher Price and others
Plaintiff:
Brandy Vernon Harris and Brandy V. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Martin, Stanley Ceasar, Jr., Kevin Kelly and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Eaglin v. McCall et al
as 0:2018cv03079
Defendant:
Ms. Charlene Toliver, Burrows, Dr. Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tyrell Eaglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Coffman et al
as 1:2018cv01455
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Robinson
Defendant:
Cynthia Coffman, Patrick Firman, Beth McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
