Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Singleton
as 2:2026cv00141
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Singleton individually - Default Noted on doing business as Kenneth L. Singleton, Attorney
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Butts v. Katherine Beye
as 20-7605
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH L. SINGLETON, in his individual capacity as Counselor at Law and KATHERINE MARY BEYE, in her individual capacity as Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY LEE BUTTS
Butts v. Beye et al
as 1:2020cv00939
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts
Defendant:
Katherine Mary Beye and Kenneth L. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butts v. Beye et al
as 1:2019cv00376
Defendant:
George E. Schaefer, Junius P. Fulton, III, Norfolk Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04134
Plaintiff:
KENNETH Q. SINGLETON
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carkhuff v. Singleton et al
as 2:2016cv00505
Plaintiff:
Arden G Carkhuff
Defendant:
Kenneth G Singleton and Williams Brothers Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00751
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roy Singleton, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Singleton v. Locomotive Engineers and Conductors Mutual Protection Association
as 1:2008cv02349
Plaintiff:
Kenneth T Singleton, Kenneth T Singleton and Kenneth T Singleton
Defendant:
Locomotive Engineers and Conductors Mutual Protection Association
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
