Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Taylor et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06483
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Taylor and Joy Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Taylor and Joy Taylor
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
Betty Taylor and Kenneth Taylor
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Organon USA, Inc et al
as 4:2012cv02312
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Taylor and Kenneth Taylor
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., LLC , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Taylor et al v. Organon USA, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv09301
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Taylor and Kenneth Taylor
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
TAYLOR et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TAYLOR and PETER JONES
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
TAYLOR v. VIAD CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv62924
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TAYLOR and KENNETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
VIAD CORP. and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KOCZKODON v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2008cv04937
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KOCZKODON
Defendant:
KENNETH TAYLOR, DARRELL SAMPSON, ERIK ROMANCZUK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2008cv67881
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
