Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Kenneth Johnson v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 19-55056
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, R. BRIGGS, Third Level Review ("TLR") Appeal Examiner, Correctional Captain, official capacity, P. KELLER, Second Level Review(er) ("SLR"), Assoc. Govt. Pgrm. Analyst, official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE JOHNSON
Kenneth Wayne Johnson v. Neil McDowell et al
as 5:2017cv02054
Defendant:
R. Briggs, P. Keller, Neil McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Kenneth Johnson v. Neil McDowell
as 17-55511
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02220
Movant:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kenneth Wayne Johnson v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2016cv01221
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Kenneth Wayne Johnson v. Niel McDowell
as 2:2015cv06611
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Niel McDowell
Kenneth Johnson v. C. Maiorana, Warden
as 15-30641
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
C. MAIORANA, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Oakdale
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
