Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Samuel Mwabira-Simera v. Morgan State University
as 21-1283
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN BANKS, Vice President Student Affairs, STACEY BENN, Vice President for Finance and Management, DAVID WILSON, President of Morgan State University and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL H. MWABIRA-SIMERA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mwabira-Simera v. Morgan State University et al
as 1:2019cv03320
Defendant:
Hans Cooper, Shire Williams, V. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Mwabira-Simera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emmanuel Uzoechi v. David Wilson
as 18-1629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL CHUKWUEBUKA UZOECHI
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. DAVID WILSON, President of Morgan State University, DR. KEVIN BANKS, President of Division of Student Affairs, MR. SEYMOUR E. CHAMBERS, Chief Judicial Affairs Officer and others
Emmanuel Uzoechi v. David Wilson
as 17-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL CHUKWUEBUKA UZOECHI
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. DAVID WILSON, President of Morgan State University, DR. KEVIN BANKS, President of Division of Student Affairs, MR. SEYMOUR E. CHAMBERS, Chief Judicial Affairs Officer and others
Uzoechi v. Wilson et al
as 1:2016cv03975
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Chukwuebuka Uzoechi
Defendant:
David Wilson, Kevin Banks, Seymour E. Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Banks v. Nagle et al
as 3:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kevin Banks
Defendant:
Nagle, G. Kinard, V. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Banks v. Nagle et al
as 3:2007cv00419
Plaintiff:
Kevin Banks
Defendant:
Nagle, G. Kinard and V. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
