Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ralph Wilson, Jr. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
as 23-2122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH JAMES WILSON, JR., d/b/a Ralph Wilson Jr. Law Firm, LLC, Personally and as Agent/Owner/Operator of Ralph Wilson Law PC
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, ASHLEY JOLDA, individually and as an employee of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, KEVIN STRICKLAND, as employee of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Defendant:
HORRY COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MATHEW CHIVATTONI, as an employee of Myrtle Beach Police Department, OFFICER SHANNON, as an employee of Myrtle Beach Police Department and others
Wilson v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division et al
as 4:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson, Jr Personally and as Agent/Owner/Operator of Ralph Wilson Law PC d/b/a Ralph Wilson Law Firm, LLC agent of Ralph Wilson Law PC doing business as Ralph Wilson Jr Law Firm PC
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Ashley Jolda, Kevin Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Invictus v. South Carolina et al
as 5:2021cv00109
Defendant:
York County Solicitor's Office, South Carolina, Solicitor Kevin Brackett and others
Plaintiff:
Augustus Invictus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Bryant et al
as 0:2015cv05035
Plaintiff:
Gregory S King
Defendant:
Bruce Bryant and Kevin Brackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Holmes v. Elaine Marshall
as 09-1101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE T. HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
ELAINE F. MARSHALL, NC Secretary of State, DEREK G. WILES, WAYNE GROOMS and others
Holmes v. Marshall et al
as 3:2008cv00600
Plaintiff:
Eugene T. Holmes
Defendant:
Elaine F. Marshall, Derek G. Wiles, Wayne Grooms and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tate v. Brackett et al
as 2:2008cv03833
Plaintiff:
Randy Tate
Defendant:
Kevin Brackett, Dan Hall, Erin Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
