Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams v. Cohen et al
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
Mark H Cohen, Steven D Grimberg, Thomas W Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollowell v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Defendant:
Norman L. Barnett, Stephanie E. Gabay-Smith, Byron L. Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clanton v. blinken et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff:
Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant:
antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Footman v. United States Nothern District Court et al
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Justin Footman
Defendant:
United States Nothern District Court and Kevin P. Weimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Blinken
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore benefiiciary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore beneficiary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, United States, Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, United States, Heirs & Assignees, Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, SSA, Heirs & Assignees and others
Brown v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09205
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Anderson Brown
Defendant:
Antony John Blinken, Janet Louise Yellen, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
