Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Reinig et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Tina Reinig, Gloria Grover, Mary May and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
STOKES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36541
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES KEVIN STOKES JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. Dovey et al
as 1:2016cv01472
Petitioner:
Daryl Kevin Stokes
Respondent:
Richard H. Dovey and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv04244
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stokes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stokes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Stokes et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01289
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stokes and Laura Fair-Stokes
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stokes v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stokes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Stokes v. Bishop et al
as 8:2012cv00840
Petitioner:
Daryl Kevin Stokes
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
