Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cox v. Cox
as 4:2026cv02712
Petitioner:
Erna A Cox
Respondent:
Kevin Stuart Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Poole v. Dicky et al
as 4:2025cv05114
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bennard Poole
Defendant:
Wayne Dicky, Kevin Stuart, Jason Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yu v. Stuart
as 4:2025cv03874
Petitioner:
Peng Yu
Respondent:
Kevin Stuart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waggoner v. Stuart et al
as 4:2025cv03687
Plaintiff:
Charles Waggoner
Defendant:
Kevin Stuart, Wayne Dicky and Officer Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Stuart
as 4:2025cv02061
Petitioner:
Jayson Lynn Green
Respondent:
Kevin Stuart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford v. Dickey et al
as 4:2025cv00319
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davon Ford, Sr.
Defendant:
Wayne Dickey, Kevin Stuart and Brazos County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Candee v. Brazos County Sheriff's Administration et al
as 4:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jordan Matthew Candee
Defendant:
Brazos County Sheriff's Administration, Kevin Stuart and Lt Belanger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Dicky et al
as 4:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Terry D Gray
Defendant:
Wayne Dicky, Paul Martinez, Kevin Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv08943
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stuart
Defendant:
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc., Harry E. Sloan, Jason Kelly and others
Gerald Carroll, et al v. E One Inc, et al
as 17-2183
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellant:
RAY FOSTER, CHARLES HOTTINGER, LAWRENCE SHELDRAKE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
E ONE INC, PIERCE MANUFACTURING INC, SEAGRAVE FIRE APPARATUS LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
