Cases 51 - 60 of 1,811
Peterson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Peterson and Bonnie Jean Peterson
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03197
Plaintiff:
Zachary Adams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tynes v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Rebecca X Tynes
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Terhune v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Wayne William Terhune, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Wilmar Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
BOST v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
LESSIE BOST
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ELLERBEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEVERNE ELLERBEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Boardwine v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jo L. Boardwine
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bias v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Tracy Bias
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vann v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Louvenia Manley Vann
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
