Cases 71 - 80 of 142
Elijah Wallace v. J. Lazondo, et al
as 19-20473
Defendant / Appellee:
KIM OGG, Houston District Attorney Office, NIKITA HORMAN, Judge 176th Courtroom and J. LAZONDO, Houston Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIJAH WILLIAM WALLACE
David Lancaster v. Harris County, et al
as 19-20445
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN TAYLOR, Deputy, JAMES H. COX, II, Deputy, JUDY WARNE, Judge, 257th District Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. LANCASTER
Teresa Waters v. Texas Attorney General, et al
as 19-20414
Defendant / Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, In their Official Capacity, KEN PAXTON, TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, In their Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERESA ANN WATERS
Wallace v. Lazondo et al
as 4:2019cv02093
Respondent:
J. Lazondo, Kim Ogg and Nikita Horman
Petitioner:
Elijah William Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosier v. Ogg et al
as 4:2019cv02081
Defendant:
Kelli Johnson, Lina Hidalgo, Ed Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Mosier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Ogg et al
as 4:2019cv01850
Respondent:
Harris County Sherif Ed Gonzalez, Ken Paxton, District Attorney Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Demond T. Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Suarez v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv01656
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, District Attorney Kim Ogg and Susan Brown
Plaintiff:
Oscar Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mearis v. Ogg et al
as 4:2019cv01613
Respondent:
Attorney Jerome Godinich and District Attorney Kim Ogg
Petitioner:
David Wayne Mearis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. OGG et al
as 4:2019cv01360
Plaintiff:
Steven Leonie Roberts
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, Sex Offender Registration, KIM OGG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butler v. GONZALEZ et al
as 4:2019cv01125
Respondent:
ED GONZALEZ and KIM OGG
Petitioner:
Tyreese D Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
