Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hodges v. Thomas, et al. (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gene Hodges
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Luther Strange and Walter Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Smith v. Donal Campbell, et al
as 14-10721
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH CLIFTON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DONAL CAMPBELL and KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, Commissioner
Washington v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charlie Washington
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Luther Strange and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frazier v. Myers et al (DEATH PENALTY)(JOINT ASSIGN)(MEMBER)
as 2:2013cv00781
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Frazier
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thomas (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Shonelle Jackson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Thomas (DEATH PENALTY)
as 3:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
Corey Schirod Smith
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Anthony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
William Bush
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Luther Strange and Anthony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Alabama Lethal Injection Protocol Litigation (DEATH PENALTY)(LEAD)
as 2:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Anthony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2011cv00438
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Anthony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur v. Haley
as 2:2001cv00983
Petitioner:
Thomas D Arthur
Respondent:
Michael Haley and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
