Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant:
S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stueben v. Meade et al
as 5:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stueben
Defendant:
Desmond Meade, Contrina Vaughn, Steve Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ANDERSEN v. PERRY JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
LAUREN ANDERSEN
Defendant:
PERRY JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., JEFFREY HUBBARD, NORTHWELL HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shewchuk v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shewchuk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beckham v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Dayshawn Beckham
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Spencer B. Merriweather, Kimberly Gardener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaylor v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kaylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
