Cases 41 - 50 of 498
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
CURTIS KING
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KING v. BRANHAM et al
as 1:2021cv03008
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. KING, JR.
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, ANDREW VERBOCHT, JOHN COCHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIPLEY COUNTY INDIANA, INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWES-NORTHERN v. RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02619
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC. and BURGER KING CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
BRUCE v. WEXFORD of INDIANA LLC. et al
as 1:2021cv02465
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M BRUCE
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA L.L.C., PAUL A. TALBOT, DR. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND et al v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2021cv02796
Plaintiff:
INDIANA RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND and SARKES TARZIAN, INC.
Defendant:
HOLLI SULLIVAN, INDIANA ELECTION COMMISSION, PAUL OKESON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lucas v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dianne Bear King Lucas
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
MABES et al v. MCFEELEY et al
as 1:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES and BRIAN MABES
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02201
Plaintiff:
RODNEY MACK KING
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
