Cases 1 - 9 of 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. KIRCH
as 1:2017mc00044
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
BEVERLY S. KIRCH
Kirch v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv02968
Plaintiff:
Linda Kirch
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Vital Recovery Services and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kendall v. Everett et al
as 1:2013cv02913
Plaintiff:
Denise Kendall
Defendant:
Kirch P. Everett and Daniel Liesen
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Kamilla Kirch
as 12-40393
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KAMILLA KIRCH
Kirk Williams v. USDC, Sacramento
as 12-70742
:
In re: KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Kirch, et al v. Embarq Management CO, et al
as 11-3275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN KIRCH and TERRY KIRCH
Defendant - Appellee:
EMBARQ MANAGEMENT CO, a Delware corporation and UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF EASTERN KANSAS, a Delware corporation
Defendant:
DOE DEFENDANTS 1-5
Kirch et al v. Embarq Management Co. et al
as 2:2010cv02047
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kirch and Terry Kirch
Defendant:
Embarq Management Co., United Telephone Company of Eastern Kansas and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Thornton et al v. MemberWorks, Incorporated et al
as 1:2009vm75009
Plaintiff:
Joan Thornton, Joan Thornton, Joan Thornton and others
Defendant:
Memberworks, Incorporated, Adaptive Marketing LLC and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thornton et al v. MemberWorks, Incorporated et al
as 2:2009cv02262
Plaintiff:
Joan Thornton, Joan Thornton, Joan Thornton and others
Defendant:
MemberWorks, Incorporated, Adaptive Marketing LLC and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
