Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 16-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES STILE
Defendant - Appellee: HERRERA, Corrections Officer, PIKE, Corrections Officer, SOMERSET COUNTY and others
BELSKIS v. SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00287
Plaintiff: JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS
Defendant: SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL , MEDPRO ASSOCIATES, DAVID ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Brien v. Kline et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00443
Defendant: Donahue, Tucker & Ciandella, PLLC, Robert Donovan and Loreen Lougee Kline
Plaintiff: Wendy Lougee O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant: ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party: OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee: PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court: M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff: THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11906
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Rohn, et al v. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Cen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Plaintiff: MILTON GREENE, CROSSROADS ACQUISITION CORP, WILLIAM M. PORTER and others
Defendant: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party - Appellee: DANA FARBER/HARVARD CANCER CENTER, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2494
Plaintiff - Appellee: MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDREY ROHN, individually and as executrix of the estate of Dennis Rohn, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Silverwood Partners LLC v. Secure Path Technology LLC et al
as 1:2010cv10890
Plaintiff: Silverwood Partners LLC
Defendant: Secure Path Technology LLC and Josh C. Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rohn, et al v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, I, et al
as 09-1887
Plaintiff - Appellee: MILTON GREENE, WILLIAM M. PORTER, LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS ROHN, BARBARA SENSING and VALERIE SAMSELL
Interested Party - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant - Appellee: TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, LIMITED
Interested Party: SOUTHEASTERN UROLOGICAL CENTER, P.A., KLINE & SPECTER GROUP and KLINE & SPECTER, PC
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Medina-Cardona et al v. Hogar HM et al
as 3:2008cv02105
Plaintiff: Carrie R. Medina-Cardona, Carrie Rae Medina, Jose Kline Medina and others
Defendant: Hogar HM, Francisco Lizardo, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?