Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Pamela Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Card v. Chin et al
as 3:2023cv05760
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Judge Jason Chin, Sue Young Ra, Joshi Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trowell v. Uhler et al
as 9:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
Ramzidden Trowell
Defendant:
D. Uhler, E. Bell, C. Corvea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Reeder v. Koenigsmann et al
as 9:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Michael Hogan, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Jones v. Warden Kuma DeBoo
as 16-6565
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JONES, a/k/a William Seymour Jones
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN KUMA J. DEBOO
Flemming v. Santamore et al
as 9:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Scott Santamore, Jame Spinner, Jr., Theodore C. Zerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Jones v. Warden Kuma DeBoo
as 14-7753
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JONES, a/k/a William Seymour Jones
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN KUMA J. DEBOO
Herman Billups v. Russell Perdue
as 14-7266
Petitioner - Appellant:
HERMAN LEWIS BILLUPS, a/k/a Herman Lewis Billups
Respondent - Appellee:
RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden
Respondent:
KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, FCI Gilmer
Muhammad v Heady et al
as 1:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Dane Heady, Michael Weaver, Eddie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
