Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Liles et al
as 5:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Ozie L. Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew L. Liles, James Steven Bass, Alexendra S. Schauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYLER v. FISCHER et al
as 1:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
J. CLARK FISCHER, FORSYTH COUNTY, JIM O'NELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GOLDSBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00605
Defendant:
PAUL A. SHANNER, SUSAN SPONATE, RONALD J. SHORT and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. BROYHILL et al
as 1:2020cv00424
Respondent:
TIMOTHY P. BROYHILL, ALISON LESTER and DAVID L. HALL
Petitioner:
BARRY RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv00596
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Hall
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOWDEN v. 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OFFICE et al
as 1:2019cv01102
Defendant:
LISA S. COSTNER, DAVID SIPPRELL, OFFICE OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN BOWDEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
