Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nealy v. Shinn, et al.
as 23-4080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. NEALY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, R CARR, Deputy Warden at Eyman Complex, SMU 1 Unit, S BRENNAN, Captain/Disciplinary Hearing Officer at SMU 1 and others
Scharnke v. Stickley et al
as 3:2022cv00923
Plaintiff:
Victoria L Scharnke and Victoria L Stickley
Defendant:
William A Stickley and Feisal Amin Istrabadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Shaheed-Muhammad, #148986 v. Centurion Arizona et al
as 2:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad
Defendant:
Centurion Arizona, Unknown Stickley, Unknown Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris #113830 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01487
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
David C Shinn, Unknown Ridenour, Unknown Stickley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker #304205 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01237
Plaintiff:
Richard Walker
Defendant:
David Shinn, C R Glynn, L Stickley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Derello, Jr. v. John McAdorey, et al
as 21-15835
Defendant / Appellee:
DIGIRO, Sergeant at SMU I, JOHN DOES, Officers at SMU 1, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS WAYNE DERELLO, Jr., AKA Douglas Wayne Derello
Granado #246943 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02142
Defendant:
R Montes, D Walker, Unknown Espinosa and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Angel Granado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derello #37292 v. McAdorey et al
as 2:2019cv05884
Defendant:
Unknown Montes, S Scott, L Stickley and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wayne Derello, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stickley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv02032
Plaintiff:
Ricky L Stickley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
