Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Bankston et al v. Alexander, M.D. et al
as 3:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
Karmen Bankston , Daniel Hale and Angela Hale
Defendant:
Stanley L. Alexander, M.D. , Fountain Skin Care Cosmetic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. , Kenneth D. Christman, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. RLA Enterprise LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01135
Defendant:
RLA Enterprise LLC, Basctk LLC, Randolph L Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1983
USA v. Devon Alexander
as 12-2846
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEVON L. ALEXANDER
Bedford et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bedford , Arnold A. Acosta , Henry E. Adams and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc, BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. ALEXANDER
as 4:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
VERONICA L ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Richard Alexander v. Kondaur Capital
as 11-1797
Debtor - Appellant:
RICHARD L. ALEXANDER
Appellee:
KONDAUR CAPITAL
Richard L. Alexander v. Prime Asset Fund II
as 11-1798
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: RICHARD L. ALEXANDER
Appellee:
PRIME ASSET FUND II
Eddie Bush v. USDC-WAESP
as 11-70480
:
In re: EDDIE JOE BUSH
Petitioner:
EDDIE JOE BUSH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHY BIRDSELL, AND OTHER UNKNOWN RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OF THE CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES and others
US v. Devon Alexander
as 10-7161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEVON L. ALEXANDER
United States v. Sharon Alexander
as 09-2744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States
Defendant - Appellant:
Sharon L. Alexander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
