Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Copeland v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2023cv00115
Petitioner:
Jermaine L. Copeland
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland v. USA
as 3:2022cv01114
Petitioner:
Keaton L. Copeland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Merrill v. Copeland
as 22-1928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Heather Merrill
Defendant / Appellee:
Corrine L. Copeland
COPELAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53723
Plaintiff:
CAMERON L COPELAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPELAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06857
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BURL L COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Inch et al
as 1:2020cv22122
Defendant:
Dubrey, Florida Department of Corrections and Mark S. Inch
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPELAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59698
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BURL L COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPELAND v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv04137
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
TRACIE L COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00438
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
