Cases 61 - 70 of 86
JACKSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76086
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR L. JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CUSTIS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv72931
Plaintiff:
NORMAN JACKSON and LUCILLE L. JACKSON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JACKSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 3:2009cv03117
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. JACKSON
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA, LP and KBI SUB INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. HAYMAN et al
as 3:2009cv01833
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, MICHELLE R. RICCI, L. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
AKER et al v. THE KEETON GROUP, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. AKER, JUDITH A. AKER, RONALD L. BEACHY and others
Defendant:
THE KEETON GROUP, LLC, STANDARD LAND COMPANY, INC., VIRGINIA ENERGY CONSULTING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jackson v. Mege et al
as 1:2009cv00577
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Jackson
Defendant:
Alan R. Mege, Esq., Law Offices of Alan R. Mege and Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JACKSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62634
Plaintiff:
JUDITH L JACKSON
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CUTLER-HAMMER IDT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JACKSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2008cv01396
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. JACKSON
Defendant:
VALERIA JOHNSON and TAMARA HAWTHORNE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Raymond Jackson
as 08-3458
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND L. JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
