Cases 71 - 80 of 136
Jackson v. Examination Management Services, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00180
Defendant:
Examination Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jackson v. Welch et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Jackson
Defendant:
J Welch, A Wyatt and D Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00767
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana and N. Burl Cain
Petitioner:
Howard L. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bui et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00375
Plaintiff:
Anna Tuyet Bui , Dich Bui , Cherry Street Grocery, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. , International Paper Company and All Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jeremy Pinson v. Annette Gordon, et al
as 12-20706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY V. PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNETTE GORDON, RACHEL CHAPA, DETRA WILLIS and others
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02477
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Jackson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bui et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anna Tuyet Bui , Dich Bui , Cherry Street Grocery, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv02064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hall
as 3:2012cv00520
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Jackson
Respondent:
Berkely Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pinson v. Gordon et al
as 4:2012cv02206
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Annette Gordon, Rachel Chapa, Detra Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
