Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Scott v. Malone et al
as 2:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
Antwon L. Scott
Defendant:
Dan Malone and Tanya M. Duby-Gritzuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2023cv02800
Petitioner:
Antwan L. Scott
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Director Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2018cv02032
Defendant:
Christy L Scott, South Carolina, State of, Tammy Mickalis and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda H Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford Plantation Club Inc, The v. Scott et al
as 2:2018mc00258
Plaintiff:
Ford Plantation Club Inc, The
Defendant:
Michael L Scott and Nancy J Scott
Scott v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 8:2015cv03642
Plaintiff:
Vivian L Scott
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scott v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv03297
Plaintiff:
Damon L Scott
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv02290
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden, Octavius Wilfork, Christopher Powers and others
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGM Insurance Company v. Scott et al
as 3:2011cv01784
Plaintiff:
NGM Insurance Company
Defendant:
Horace L Scott , Office-Church-School Supply Company Inc and Abelina Garfia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. DISH Network et al
as 8:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Carrie L Scott and Joseph E Macon
Defendant:
DISH Network and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
