Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Lacourse v. Dropbike Corp
as 1:2026cv00878
Plaintiff:
Brian Lacourse
Defendant:
Dropbike Corp doing business as Drop Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t - Diversity: Torts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Tim LaCourse v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv05745
Defendant:
Chubb Fire LTD, The Chemours Company, ChemDesign Products Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Tim LaCourse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Christine Scott
as 23-13411
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINE SCOTT
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Peterson v. Williams, et al
as 20-4059
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacities, DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY, a public collect of the State of Utah; JOHN DOES I-X, in their individual and official capacities; ROE ENTITIES I-X, LYNN JOSEPH, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN PETERSON, an individual
Patricia Lacourse v. Defense Support Services LLC, et al
as 19-13883
Defendant / Appellee:
WITNESS 9, WITNESS 7, JOHN DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA LACOURSE
Peterson v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Dixie State University, Lynn Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Patricia Lacourse
as 19-10266
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICIA LACOURSE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
