Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Johnson v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv03524
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamar Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Michael Jarcord
as 21-13975
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JARCORD, a.k.a. Timothy Lamar Johnson
Johnson v. Upton et al
as 5:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Chief FNU Williams, Stacey Webb, Chief FNU Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv78272
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAMAR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeanty et al v. Elkins et al
as 2:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ewing, Jason Jerome Springer, Jerome L. Pitts and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Linda Geter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35108
Plaintiff:
KEITH LAMAR JOHNSON JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04285
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR LAMAR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON, ET AL V. BELL, ET AL
as 7:2020cv00004
Defendant:
BRIAN BELL, RODNEY BRYAN, BRANDON BELL and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK LAMAR JOHNSON, KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Gary Ray Maxwell, State of Alabama, Dewayne Estes and others
Plaintiff:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Marshall
as 5:2019cv00836
Respondent:
Steve Marshall
Petitioner:
David Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
