Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Swearingen v. Davis
as 4:2019cv03079
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Unknown Executioners, Senior Warden Billy Lewis and others
Respondent:
Warden Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Swearingen v. Sharon Keller, et al
as 17-51119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY RAY SWEARINGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON KELLER, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals, LAWRENCE E. MEYERS, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals, BERT RICHARDSON, Judge Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Swearingen v. Keller, et al
as 1:2016cv01181
Defendant:
Barbara Gladden Adamick, Elsa Alcala, Tommy Gage and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swearingen et al v. Thaler et al
as 9:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Brad Livingston, Oliver Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Swearingen v. Barack Obama, et al
as 11-20468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY RAY SWEARINGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, GREG ABBOTT, Attorney General to the State of Texas and others
Swearingen v. Obama et al
as 4:2011cv01765
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swearingen v. Obama et al
as 9:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swearingen v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv01219
Petitioner:
Larry Ray Swearingen
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larry Swearingen v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-70036
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY RAY SWEARINGEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
