Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Glover v. Middleton
as 2:2023cv01767
Plaintiff:
Larry Robert Glover
Defendant:
Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Schertz et al
as 4:2019cv00343
Defendant:
Colter Levinson, Angela Schertz, Jackie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Ervine et al
as 4:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Douglas Ervine, Colter Levinson and Doris Donaldson
Plaintiff:
Larry Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cedar County, Missouri et al
as 6:2019cv03243
Defendant:
Jay Williams, Garrett Lukenbill, Leon Dwerlkotte and others
Plaintiff:
Shane V Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Long et al
as 5:2018cv03286
Defendant:
Brock Abbey, Larry Robert Long and Gregory Michael Jones
Plaintiff:
Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOURSTAR v. GARDEN CITY GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, INC., JULIA CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Klamath County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01223
Defendant:
Carla, Klamath County Jail and Stripling
Plaintiff:
Larry Robert Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Klamath County Parole and Probation et al
as 1:2017cv01227
Defendant:
Keith Cokely, Klamath County Parole and Probation and Dan Leninger
Plaintiff:
Larry Robert Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peete v. Combs et al
as 4:2017cv11652
Plaintiff:
Lad D. Peete
Defendant:
Thomas Combs, Barbara Sampson, Helen White and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
CAMPBELL v. GARDEN CITY GROUP et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROY OLIVER CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GARDEN CITY GROUP, JULIE CHAVEZ, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
