Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Peterson v. Morris et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Sylvia Morris and Ulli Klemm
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PETERSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv06997
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv06354
Plaintiff:
LILLIE LEWIS , LAWRENCE PETERSON , GEORGE BUNTING and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence Peterson v. Glunt, et al
as 16-3861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GLUNT, BARBER, HOOVER and others
PETERSON v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GLUNT, MS. BARBER, MS. HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pablo Acre v. Dominick Stranieri
as 14-3266
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PABLO ACRE
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
IVETTE ACRE, RICHARD ALTENOR, ROBIN ALTENOR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DOMINICK P. STRANIERI, CHASE MANHATTAN CORP and WILLIAM K. SPANER
Defendant - Appellant:
Y RENT INC, HOMES BY VINTAGE INC, CHAPEL CREEK MORTGAGE BANKER INC and others
Pablo Acre, et al v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage, et al
as 13-4748
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PABLO ACRE, LOUISE DEVAUX and JOSEPH MAHAMA
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
IVETTE ACRE, ROBIN ALTENOR, KEVIN ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Petitioner:
MYRON ROBERTS and SANDRO TERRANA
Petitioner - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JAY COLON
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE, WILLIAM K. SPANER and DOMINICK P. STRANIERI
Defendant - Appellant:
GENE PAUL PERCUDANI, CHAPEL CREEK HOMES, RAINTREE HOMES INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
