Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Johnson v. Floyd et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Tommy Franklin Floyd, American Commerical Transportation and GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Huffman
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Superintendent Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. M.D.O.C.
as 3:2019cv00566
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
M.D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. M.D.O.C.
as 3:2019cv00565
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
M.D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 3:2019cv00567
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Fredrick Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. City of Biloxi Municipal Court et al
as 1:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Bob Payne, Justice Court, City of Biloxi Mayor and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00307
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gonzalez
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Willie Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holland v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
Mario Holland
Defendant:
Murphy Oil U.S.A. Inc. , Aden, LLC, Raman Aman, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holland v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
Mario Holland
Defendant:
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. , Aden, LLC, Raman Aman, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
