Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rodriguez v. Hotel ZaZa Houston et al
as 4:2018cv00729
Defendant:
Sovereign Services of Houston, Derek Criddle, Terrance Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Henderson et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 6:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Lee Mays Henderson and Steven B. Henderson
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Johnny Mays v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-10855
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE MAYS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
May v. Stephens
as 2:2014cv00806
Petitioner:
Albert Lee May
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays v. USA
as 5:2014cv01477
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mays v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00072
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Mays
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. U S Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv02583
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Mays
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
May et al v. Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP et al
as 4:2011cv03516
Plaintiff:
Erika Christianna May and Richard Lee May, Sr.
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mays v. Alford et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Mays
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
May v. Kimball
as 1:2008cv00347
Plaintiff:
David Lee May
Defendant:
Susan Kimball
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
