Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Henson v. Burke et al
as 5:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ann Nicole Henson
Defendant:
Amy Burke, Janet Humphrey-Cole, Megan N. Bosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Deng v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff:
Ngong L. Deng
Defendant:
Judge Ann Bailey Smith, Judge Barry Willett, Judge Erica Lee Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Domistic Relations Court et al
as 1:2018cv02125
Defendant:
Judge Laura Gallager and Domistic Relations Court
Plaintiff:
Annie Lee Williams and Secunda Williams-Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Moody, et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et al
as 16-2369
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JOHN MOODY, WALLY MCILLMURRAY, RICK RAY and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, RICHARD KALM, GARY POST and others
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
AL ERNST and JOHN LESSNAU
John Moody, et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et al
as 16-2244
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN MOODY, DONALD HARMON, RICK RAY and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, RICHARD KALM, GARY POST and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AL ERNST and JOHN LESSNAU
John Moody, et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et al
as 14-1511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MOODY, DONALD HARMON, RICK RAY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD, RICHARD KALM, GARY POST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moody et al v. Michigan Gaming Control Board et al
as 2:2012cv13593
Plaintiff:
John Moody , Donald Harmon , Rick Ray and others
Defendant:
Michigan Gaming Control Board , Richard Kalm , Gary Post and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
