Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Lacy Williams, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 16-6067
Petitioner - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Lacy Williams, Jr. v. Barack Obama
as 16-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, President, Administration, Individual and Official Capacity, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. Attorney General, Individual and Official Capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Disability Rights Section - NYA, Civil Rights Division/Litigation Section , PHB and others
Lacy Lee Williams, Jr. v. Central Prison
as 15-8034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL PRISON, ROY COOPER, SERGEANT RADDON and others
US v. David William
as 15-7854
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LEE WILLIAMS
Lacy Lee Williams, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7837
Petitioner - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 0:2015cv04073
Petitioner:
Jared Lee Williams
Respondent:
Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacy Lee Williams, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 15-7402
Petitioner - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Williams v. USA
as 3:2015cv00377
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tommie Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Obama, et al
as 5:2015ct03181
Plaintiff:
Lacy Lee Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08828
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lee Williams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
