Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Jennings v. Municipality of Suffolk County
as 13-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde J. Jennings
Defendant:
Transportating Police Officer John Doe, Shield #5729, Stationhouse Detective John Doe, Shield #4096, Police Department Cell Attendant, Shield #116 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Municipality of Suffolk County, Steve Levy, County Executive, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HUDSON v. LEVY COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HUDSON
Defendant:
LEVY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLER v. LEVY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R KELLER
Defendant:
LEVY COUNTY JAIL, RUSSELL HINOTE and C HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYKIN v. LEVY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
CECIL EUGENE BOYKIN, JR
Defendant:
LEVY COUNTY JAIL, JOHNNY SMITH, LISA MATTHIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20911 NE 40 STREET WILLISTON LEVY COUNTY FLORIDA WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES THEREON
as 1:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 20911 NE 40 STREET WILLISTON LEVY COUNTY FLORIDA WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES THEREON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
RICHARDSON-ROSS v. LEVY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 1:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
ABBY RICHARDSON-ROSS
Defendant:
LEVY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and WILLIE LEE POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC v. LEVY COUNTY
as 1:2004cv00072
Plaintiff:
WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
Defendant:
LEVY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
