Cases 21 - 30 of 529
Biggs-Leavy v. Lewis
as 2:2023cv12123
Plaintiff:
Beverly Biggs-Leavy
Defendant:
Ladel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11895
Plaintiff:
Amber Lewis
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, d/b/a BCBSM and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garner v. Haines et al
as 2:2023cv11555
Plaintiff:
Chad Garner
Defendant:
Corey Haines, The City Of Madison Heights, Jeff Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Randle v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023cv11370
Plaintiff:
Kamryn Randle
Defendant:
Ladel Lewis, Eva Worthing, Judy Priestly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Almaguer et al
as 5:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Jina Edwards
Defendant:
Andrea Almaguer, Andy Lewis, Ia Chanae Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Glendrick Gardner v. LFUCG, et al
as 23-5361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENDRICK GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, RUSSELL SCOTT, Active Assistant Director LFUCG (Waste Management), WILLIAM JONES, Yard Waste Supervisor LFUCG (Waste Management) and others
Ellis v.County of Hamilton, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government, Bryan Sinclair Ellis, County of Hamilton, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
