Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Croghan v. Brunning et al
as 4:2014cv03238
Defendant:
Shannon Anderson, W. Mark Ashford, John Brunning and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dale Croghan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. DDE, Inc. et al
as 8:2013mc00096
Defendant:
DDE, Inc.
Debtor:
Hearthstone Homes
Plaintiff:
C. Randel Lewis
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Skala v. Lewis
as 4:2013cv03163
Defendant:
Susan P. Lewis
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Skala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Lewis v. USA
as 8:2013cv00253
Petitioner:
Edward Eugene Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lewis v. Bowie et al
as 8:2013cv00193
Respondent:
A. Warten Bee, Judge Russell Bowie, Midishaw and others
Petitioner:
Eric Fritzgerald Lewis
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Houston et al
as 4:2013cv03092
Respondent:
Fred Britten and Robert P. Houston
Petitioner:
Eric Fritzgerald Lewis
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
