Cases 41 - 50 of 908
Lewis v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 7:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Danny Lewis
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, A.G. BATEMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00773
Plaintiff:
Kurt Lewis, Sr and Kurt Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Lentz v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023ct03078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
Travon Campbell, Aisha Cherry, Hunter Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03077
Plaintiff:
Clevis M. Morrison
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Raven Barnes, Officer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORIETY v SLETTEN et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
WAKITA DORIETY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA and MATTHEW LEWIS SLETTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
