Cases 1 - 10 of 225
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Lillard
as 24-3058
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LONNIE LILLARD
United States of America v. Lillard
as 24-3055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LONNIE EUGENE LILLARD
Lillard v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-2905
Petitioner:
LONNIE LILLARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01225
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01151
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gentry et al v. Tennessee Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Howard Gentry and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Treasury, David H. Lillard, Jr. and The Nashville Community Bail Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santander Bank, N.A. v. Lillard et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Santander Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ronald J. Lillard, Pete Martinez, Jr., Empyrean Auto Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
