Cases 41 - 50 of 135
Lindsey v. Houston County et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00963
Defendant:
J. Trawick, Houston County Commissioners, Judge Derrick and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blahous v. Sarrell Regional Dental Center for Public Health, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00798
Defendant:
Sarrell Regional Dental Center for Public Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Blahous
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Cole v. Caine & Weiner Company, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01266
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Cole and Fisher
Defendant:
Caine & Weiner Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Steele et al
as 2:2018cv01079
Plaintiff:
Danielle Smith and Scott Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Zachary Steele, Lindsey Marie Lemaster, Dr Samuel D Pierce O.D., P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mertens v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 7:2018cv00654
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Mertens
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Theresia Qualls, Dr. Lindsey and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Lt. Walker, Sgt. Lindsey, C.O. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Pamela Harris, Charlotte Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mertens v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rocky Joe Mertens
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Corizon , Theresia Qualls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
