Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sanchez v. Morton et al
as 1:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Juan Sanchez
Defendant:
Geneva Morton, Loomis Fargo & Co. and Loomis Armored US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
US v. Fernandez-Torres
as 21-1417
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL FERNANDEZ-TORRES, a/k/a Tato
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO RANGER AMERICAN ARMORED CARRIER LOOMIS FARGO & CO. OF PR
NIEVES v. LOOMIS US et al
as 5:2016cv03899
Plaintiff:
CARMEN NIEVES
Defendant:
LOOMIS US , LOOMIS ARMORED US , LOOMIS FARGO & CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Hartfield v. Loomis Armored US LLC et al
as 2:2010cv07500
Defendant:
Does, Loomis Armored US LLC and Loomis Fargo & Co
Plaintiff:
Mark Hartfield
Attorney Settlement Officer:
Steven M Schneider
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loomis Fargo & Co., Inc. v. Matson Navigation Company et al
as 3:2007cv04054
Plaintiff:
Loomis Fargo & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company and SSA Terminals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Cepero v. Loomis, Fargo & Co. et al
as 1:2007cv00973
Plaintiff:
Florencio Cepero, Florencio Cepero and Florencio Cepero
Defendant:
Loomis, Fargo & Co. and Loomis Armored US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
