Cases 1 - 10 of 539
Lucero Jr. v. Blaney
as 5:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Albert Benjamin Lucero Jr.
Defendant:
John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero v. Revive Organics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Carly Lucero
Defendant:
Revive Organics, Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Revive Superfoods and Miski Organics Superfoods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Bevins #267562 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08061
Plaintiff:
Ryan September Wednesday Bevins
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Amy Lucero, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores Guillen, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1391
Petitioner:
LESLY SUCELY FLORES GUILLEN and JOSE ANGEL LUCERO FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Lucero v. Richards
as 2:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
Ramisha Slocum Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lucero Gonzalez v. Optum Care Cancer Center
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Kenia G. Lucero Gonzalez
Defendant:
Optum Care Cancer Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
