Cases 1 - 10 of 93
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittrell v. Gates et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ulyessie Kittrell
Defendant:
Eric Gates, Jason Kormanic, Shawn McGlaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
MCDONALD v. NORMAN et al
as 2:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCDONALD and RICHARD MORRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NORMAN, ACKEEM NORMAN, P/O STRAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stover v. Newberry Township et al
as 1:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Stover and Kurtis D. Stover
Defendant:
Newberry Township, Scott J. Gross, Steve Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAINOR v. SUPT. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2020cv00260
Defendant:
RICHARD DIBELLA, C.O. YO-YO, C.O. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF LOGAN TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Defendant:
JUSTIN HOLLERN, TYLER MCCONNELL, NICOLE GRIPP and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUTZ v. NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv00829
Defendant:
DONALD J. COKUS, JR., NORTH FAYETTE TOWNSHIP, DETECTIVE DONALD J. COKUS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LUTZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
