Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Tesla Motors Inc and OnQ Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00976
Plaintiff:
Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Tesla Motors Inc and OnQ Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. BROMALL et al
as 2:2021cv00281
Defendant:
LESLIE J. SCHUPP, HONORABLE JUDGE CHRIS SCHERER, GEORGE C. BROMALL and others
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James Collings v. Army and Air Force Exchange General Counsel et al
as 2:2017cv03443
Defendant:
Army and Air Force Exchange General Counsel, Thomas Skull and Lynn Thompson
Plaintiff:
James Collings
Bell v. Blue Hen Spring Works Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
James C. Bell
Defendant:
Blue Hen Spring Works Inc., Diamond State Trust, LLC, Perns Properties LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv05461
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Blue Hen Spring Works Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01753
Plaintiff:
James C. Bell
Defendant:
Blue Hen Spring Works Inc., Diamond State Trust, LLC, Perns Properties LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynne Thompson v. Randal Tood, et al
as 13-4473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDAL B. TOOD, INDIVIDUALLY, COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE, INDIVIDUALLY and others
THOMPSON v. TOOD et al
as 2:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TOOD, COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2013cv01948
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Louis Cabiling , Lynn Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
