Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,727
Garten Trucking LC v. NLRB
as 24-1571
Petitioner: GARTEN TRUCKING LC
Respondent: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01275
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Pan American Grain Manufacturing v. National Labor Relations Board
as 3:2024cv01274
Plaintiff: Pan American Grain Manufacturing
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sacks v. I.N.S.A., Inc.
as 24-1569
Petitioner: LAURA A. SACKS, Regional Director, Region 1, National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: I.N.S.A., INC.
Interested Party: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
National Labor Relations Board v. RadNet Management Inc. d/b/a San Fernando Valley Advanced Imaging Center
as 24-3790
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: RADNET MANAGEMENT INC. D/B/A SAN FERNANDO VALLEY ADVANCED IMAGING CENTER
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board, Jennifer Abruzzo, Lauren McFerran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
AVILA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
as 1:2024cv01688
Plaintiff: VICTOR AVILA
Defendant: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Ariana Cortes, et al v. NLRB
as 24-5152
Plaintiff: Ariana Cortes and Karam Logan
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. Todd
as 2:2024cv01642
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Sharlyn Todd
NLRB v. Compania Cervecera de Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 24-1187
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Compania Cervecera de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?