Cases 1 - 10 of 506
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CO 2 BANGER, CO 1 CALLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04422
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMAR WHITFIELD
Respondent:
WARDEN RENEE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Alonzo Johnson
as 24-1527
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
LAMAR v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LAMAR
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lamar Benton v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1187
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BENTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Sorber et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Lamar Brown
Respondent:
Jaime Sorber, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Adams County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benton v. DePiero et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lamar Benton
Defendant:
F. DePiero, J. Rawlings, P. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS LLC
as 2:2023cv04653
Plaintiff:
QUINTON LAMAR FREEMAN
Defendant:
CAPSTONE LOGISTICS LLC, H.I.G. CAPITAL, SHAWN BOLLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
