Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Tedder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02812
Plaintiff:
William Tedder, Maureen Cobb, Richard Tyler and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
THE CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. STANVIC ENTERTAINMENT, et al.
as 5:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
CINCINNATI SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
STANVIC ENTERTAINMENT, CHERRY 425 LLC, MATTHEW OBELGONER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Travis SmithIn re: Travis Smith
as 23-10158
Petitioner:
In re: TRAVIS LAMONT SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Woods
as 22-50721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kendall Lamonte Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Zachary Woods, Austin Police Department - Badge #8248 and Ariel Crumes, Austin Police Department Badge #8893
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Smith v. Jorsling et al
as 1:2022cv01846
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Ofc. T. A. Jorsling and Sgt. Justin Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brad SmithIn re: Brad Smith
as 22-10353
Petitioner:
In re: BRAD LAMONT SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Woods
as 1:2021cv00579
Plaintiff:
Kendall Lamonte Smith
Defendant:
Zachary Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis SmithIn re: Travis Smith
as 21-11209
Petitioner:
In re: TRAVIS LAMONT SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
