Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Bright et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Russell Crain, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Mikesell and George Thomas Lee Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Lane et al
as 3:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Revelette, Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Sgt. Devon Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Renee Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reckart v. 1300 Campbell Lane Operating Company, LLC
as 1:2020cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gary Paul Reckart, Jr.
Defendant:
1300 Campbell Lane Operating Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl
Lane v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 6:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and National Insurance Agency, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruce Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00180
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kassie Jo Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shelly M. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Mills v. Lane et al
as 5:2019cv00374
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Mills
Defendant:
Dakota Mitchell, Ben Lane, Bourbon County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons et al v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Lane Crawley, Phillip Ray, Jason Sherrow and others
Plaintiff:
April Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mills v. Lane et al
as 3:2019cv00586
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Mills
Defendant:
Dakota Mitchell, Ben Lane, Bourbon County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
